Change To How Rates Will Be Set For Thames Coromandel
Written by John Freer on June 12, 2025
By John Freer
Fairness and equity won over public feedback when Thames Coromandel District Councillors today agreed to change the district’s rating system.
The potential change from a land valuation system to capital values, brought about some lively debate for one and half hours before a 6/4 voting margin decided the issue.
Council had undergone consultation where 56 percent of the 652 submitters, supported staying with the status quo.
Those against the change advocated the importance of listening to what ratepayers wanted and using that to formalise a decision.
Cr Deli Connell said rates were about services utilised by households and not about the value of a property. Supporting was Cr Rekha Giri-Percival saying it was important councillors did not ignore the feedback.
Cr Peter Revell questioned the timing of the consideration claiming the business community could face additional costs, which under the tough economical times they could not afford.
On the other side Cr John Morrissey said besides the information provided, fairness and equity were critical around rates setting. Cr Robyn Sinclair responded to going against the public feedback, maintaining councillors having worked through all the information, were in the best position to make a decision.
Cr John Grant said the job of an elected member was more than making decisions just on feedback, it was also what is good for the district going forward. He used the comparison of who was going to make greater use of council provided services – people living in a house or those with an empty section.
The new process also enables greater use of targeting rating. The decision will come into effect for rates set for the 2026/2027 period.
John Finlayson On June 12, 2025 at 12:52 pm
What was the point of asking for submissions if they were not going to be listened to??
Tony Tony On June 12, 2025 at 2:06 pm
If Councillors know best then why squander money going to consultation?
Interested On June 12, 2025 at 4:26 pm
For those who don’t understand, consultation informs a decision – it should not make it. As Grant and Sinclair rightly point out, Council has all the info, and expert advice, not just the shallow understanding some reading a consultation doc would have.. and also, they do not (or should not) have the same vested interests or motivations as a submitter. 56% is not a major majority, by a long shot. I appreciate the Council taking a balanced view on this issue – Rates are vital to get right to ensure that our Council can cope with all the new costs coming down the pipe from Central Govt via things like the RMA reform, which I suspect a number of submitters wouldn’t really have consider, or even been cognisant of…
Lee On June 12, 2025 at 7:15 pm
can you please name who
the four were that voted for listening to the submissions and the six who voted that they knew best? helps build a picture when voting this year.
John Freer On June 12, 2025 at 9:19 pm
Those who voted in favour were Mayor Len Salt, Cr Gary Gotlieb, Cr John Morrissey, Cr Robyn Sinclair, Cr Martin Rodley, Cr John Grant
Against Cr Rekha Giri-Percival, Cr Deli Connell, Cr Peter Revell, Cr Terry Walker
Lee On June 13, 2025 at 8:41 am
thank you.